They killed the plan to save the Salton Sea — then sued to stop it. Get the facts →

Water Footprint Face-Off:
Burgers vs. Data Centers

The numbers that destroy the water myth — backed by SemiAnalysis data.

ourimperialvalley.com · March 2026
2.5
In-N-Outs = 1 Data Center
668 yrs
Of AI Use = 1 Burger
0.51
L/kWh Water Efficiency
346M
Gallons / Year (400MW DC)
🍔

The In-N-Out Comparison

One 400MW Data Center = 2.5 In-N-Out Stores

SemiAnalysis calculated the total blue-water footprint of xAI's Colossus 2 data center (400MW) in Memphis vs. an average In-N-Out Burger store selling approximately 600,000 burgers per year.

In-N-Out
(per store)
147M gal/yr
Colossus 2
(400MW DC)
346M gal/yr
245 gal
Blue water per Double-Double
668 years
Of AI use per burger (30 queries/day)

Around 95% of a burger's water footprint comes from irrigating cattle feed crops — alfalfa, corn, and other grains. Given In-N-Out's West Coast presence and fresh beef sourcing, these calculations use Southwest-specific blue-water intensity data (Rotz et al., 2019).

💧

Data Center Water Breakdown

Not All Water Is Created Equal

Colossus 2 uses a hybrid cooling system — ~130 dry coolers + ~135 adiabatic units. Dry coolers use virtually no water. Adiabatic units use a controlled mist only during hot conditions.

Cooling (evaporated): 267M gallons/year — 77% of total. Only during hot conditions with adiabatic assist.
Flush/blowdown (withdrawn): 66M gallons/year — 19%. This water is returned to the water system, not consumed.
Chip manufacturing (amortized): 13M gallons/year — 4%. Ultra-pure water used in fabrication, spread over 5-year chip lifecycle.

xAI is building a wastewater recycling plant to recycle municipal wastewater for cooling — potentially making Colossus 2 a net-zero water data center. The plant is expected to exceed the facility's cooling water needs.

Imperial Valley Does It Better

Designed for Recycled Water. A Tiny River Footprint.
✗ The Myth

"Data centers drain local water supplies and threaten our communities."

✓ The Reality

The IVDC was designed to run on recycled wastewater. After the cities backed out, the contested river request is only about 880 acre-feet/year — roughly 0.03% of IID's entitlement.

~0.03%
Of IID's River Entitlement Requested
~880
Acre-Feet/Year (less than the farm it replaces)
Recycled
Wastewater the Facility Was Designed to Use
$0
Cost to Taxpayers

Even Colossus 2 — using municipal tap water — equals only 2.5 burger restaurants. The IVDC was designed to run on recycled wastewater; its contested river request is a fraction of the farmland it replaces. The comparison is not even close.

📊

The Real Water Hogs

Context the Critics Won't Give You
Metric IVDC 1 Farm Family 2.5 In-N-Outs
Annual water~880 acre-ft (~287M gal)26.7B gal~367M gal
Water sourceDesigned for recycled wastewater; river as last resortColorado RiverMunicipal
Returns water?Recycled plan would return excess toward Salton SeaNoNo
Annual jobs1,688 + 100 permSeasonal~125
Annual tax revenue$28.75MA small fraction of the data center's~$375K

Agriculture consumes 97% of IID's 3.1 million acre-feet of Colorado River water. The IVDC uses 0.027%. Nobody files lawsuits against In-N-Out over the 147 million gallons each store consumes. But a data center using recycled wastewater? That's a "crisis."

The Water Myth Ends Here.

Share the facts. Demand accountability. The data does not support the fear.

Read the Full Article More Facts & Infographics
Sources: SemiAnalysis, "From Tokens to Burgers — A Water Footprint Face-Off" (March 2026); Rotz et al., "Environmental footprint of beef cattle production in 18 U.S. regions" (2019); IID annual water allocation records; IVCM Environmental Impact Assessment; USGS water use data.