They killed the plan to save the Salton Sea — then sued to stop it. Get the facts →

Judicial Validation:
The Court Rules for the IVDC

The debate over legality is settled. The developer followed the law.

ourimperialvalley.com · March 2026
Feb 10
2026 Ruling Date
121
Paragraphs Defeated
0
Rezonings Required
100%
Legal Standing
⚖️

The February 10, 2026 Ruling

A Decisive Victory for the Rule of Law

The Superior Court of California, County of Imperial, delivered a decisive ruling: The City of Imperial's legal challenge to the data center project was "legally insufficient."

No CUP
A Conditional Use Permit is not required.
No Rezoning
The current industrial zoning is correct and valid.
📖

The City's Failed Strategy

Attempting to Manufacture Discretionary Review

The City of Imperial filed a lawsuit to strip the project of its protected ministerial status. They argued that batteries and substations required a discretionary review and full CEQA Environmental Impact Report. They expanded their complaint to a sprawling 121 paragraphs.

The court reviewed the county's zoning laws and the project scope, and found the developer is operating entirely within their legal rights.

💸

Administrative Obstruction

Taxpayer Funds Used for Frivolous Challenges

The City of Imperial has used taxpayer funds to wage a legal war against a neighboring municipality simply because they dislike the outcome of a legal zoning process. This administrative obstruction harms the residents who stand to benefit most from this massive investment.

Respect the Court's Ruling

The IVDC is a permitted use by right. It's time to stop the frivolous lawsuits.

Learn More