Posts

The Vertically Integrated Energy-AI Campus: Imperial Valley’s Unique Opportunity

The concept of vertical integration — controlling multiple stages of a production or supply chain within a single geographic and institutional framework — creates efficiencies and competitive advantages that distributed operations cannot replicate. What Imperial Valley has, if it allows the IVDC to proceed alongside the Lithium Valley development underway, is the beginnings of a vertically integrated clean energy and technology campus that does not exist at scale anywhere else in the United States.

Let’s trace what that looks like in practice.

Stage One: Geothermal Generation

The geothermal plants already operating in the Salton Sea region produce continuous, carbon-free electricity from the volcanic heat beneath the Valley floor. This generation is baseload — it runs at full capacity around the clock regardless of weather, season, or time of day. It does not require storage to be useful because it is always available. For an AI data center that needs to run multi-day training jobs without interruption, geothermal baseload is the ideal power source.

Stage Two: Lithium Extraction

The same geothermal brine that drives the power plants contains dissolved lithium in concentrations that make commercial extraction viable. CTR and its competitors are developing the direct lithium extraction technology that would pull lithium from the brine stream during the geothermal power generation process — producing both power and battery-grade lithium from the same resource, at the same facility, with minimal additional environmental footprint.

The lithium goes into batteries. Some of those batteries could go into the 862 MWh BESS at the IVDC. The BESS stores geothermal power during off-peak periods and discharges during peak demand — integrating the storage function with the generation and the compute functions within a coherent geographic and logistical network.

Stage Three: AI Compute

The IVDC is the anchor tenant for the compute function. It consumes the geothermal power directly. It benefits from the grid stability that the BESS provides. It creates the industrial demand base that makes additional geothermal investment economically viable — because a large, stable, long-term power customer makes the financial model for new geothermal development more attractive to investors.

In a mature version of this ecosystem, the data center’s power is locally generated, locally stored, and locally managed. The transmission losses that plague long-distance power delivery are eliminated. The grid instability that makes renewable power problematic for industrial users is addressed by on-site storage. The carbon footprint of AI compute — a growing concern for both technology companies and their customers — approaches zero.

What This Requires to Become Real

The vertically integrated energy-AI campus is not science fiction. Every component of it either exists already (geothermal plants, BESS technology, data center design) or is in active development (direct lithium extraction). The geography is correct. The resource base is real. The technology is proven.

What it requires is an institutional environment that allows large capital projects to proceed through their approved development timelines without being derailed by coordinated legal obstruction. The IVDC is the first major test of whether Imperial Valley can provide that environment. If it can, the ecosystem has a starting point. If it can’t, the components will find their way to other geographies where the institutional environment is more conducive to completion.

The opportunity is genuinely rare. The community’s ability to seize it depends on getting the IVDC right.

Data Centers Don’t Belong on the Coast. They Belong in Imperial Valley.

Silicon Valley is full. The data centers that power AI have to be built somewhere. The land, power, and grid access that make Imperial Valley optimal exist in very few other places.

Read more

The National Security Case for Building AI Infrastructure in America’s Energy Hubs

The competition between the United States and China for leadership in artificial intelligence is not primarily a technology competition. It is an infrastructure competition. AI capability scales with compute — with the number and quality of AI processors running training and inference workloads. The country that builds more compute, in more secure locations, powered by more reliable energy, establishes a structural advantage that is difficult to overcome through software alone.

The federal government has recognized this. The CHIPS and Science Act, executive orders on AI infrastructure, and Department of Energy investments in data center power infrastructure all reflect a national policy judgment that domestic AI compute is a strategic asset. The question is where that compute gets built — and whether the communities best positioned to host it can create the institutional conditions for it to happen.

Why Location and Power Source Matter for Security

AI training and inference infrastructure that runs on carbon-free baseload power has advantages beyond environmental. Geothermal-powered facilities are not subject to the fuel price volatility that affects gas-fired generation. They are not vulnerable to the weather disruptions that affect solar and wind. They do not depend on long-distance transmission that is subject to physical infrastructure vulnerabilities. A data center running on locally-generated geothermal power, connected to an independent grid, in an inland location away from coastal infrastructure risks, represents a more resilient platform for strategically important compute than facilities dependent on the interconnected and sometimes fragile national grid.

This is not speculative. Grid resilience has become an explicit criterion in federal evaluations of data center suitability for government-adjacent AI workloads. The combination of geothermal baseload, IID’s independent operation, and the BESS that allows the IVDC to ride through grid disturbances creates a resilience profile that dedicated mission-critical computing facilities require.

The Domestic Investment Imperative

Every dollar of data center investment that goes to Ireland, Singapore, or even to states with less developed energy infrastructure represents American AI compute capacity that is less strategically controllable than capacity built in energy-rich domestic locations. The policy goal — which bipartisan consensus in Congress has endorsed — is to bring AI infrastructure investment to American communities where the technical and resource foundations exist.

Imperial Valley meets that description as well as any location in the country. The geothermal resources are unique. The IID grid is independent and domestically controlled. The land is available and appropriately zoned. The workforce is available and motivated. The project has cleared every legal threshold the regulatory system has imposed.

Blocking it — through the kind of coordinated institutional obstruction the IVDC has faced — is not neutral with respect to the national AI infrastructure goal. It is a concrete impediment to building the domestic compute capacity that national policy has identified as a strategic priority. The officials and organizations blocking this project are not making a local land use decision in a vacuum. They are affecting the trajectory of an investment that has national implications.

From Farmland to Tech Hub: The Transition Imperial Valley Has Been Building Toward

Imperial Valley’s identity is agricultural. The alfalfa, the vegetables, the cattle — grown in a desert made productive by the engineering marvel of the All-American Canal — are the foundation of a regional economy that has sustained families and communities for generations. The farmworker tradition, the irrigation districts, the processing and logistics infrastructure that moves the Valley’s produce to markets across the continent — these are not relics. They are active economic systems supporting real people.

They are also a foundation, not a ceiling. The same geography that made the Valley ideal for irrigated agriculture — abundant sunlight, geothermal energy beneath the surface, available land — makes it ideal for the technologies of the next economic cycle. The transition from an economy built exclusively on agriculture to one that integrates clean energy, critical minerals, and technology infrastructure is not a departure from the Valley’s identity. It is the next chapter of a community that has always succeeded by working with what the land provides.

What Economic Diversification Actually Requires

Economists who study the long-term trajectory of resource-dependent regions consistently identify diversification as the key variable separating communities that sustain themselves through multiple economic cycles from those that decline when their primary industry contracts. The agricultural economy of Imperial Valley is not in crisis — but the structural pressures on water allocation, on the agricultural labor market, and on the commodity pricing that determines farm profitability are real and long-term.

Diversification into clean energy and technology infrastructure addresses these pressures by adding economic sectors that are not correlated with agricultural commodity prices or water availability in the same way that farming is. A data center that employs engineers and technicians, generates $28 million in annual property tax, and provides a stable industrial electricity customer for IID is adding economic diversity that reduces the Valley’s vulnerability to shocks in any single sector.

This is not a novel analysis. It is the standard framework for regional economic resilience planning. What is unusual about Imperial Valley’s situation is the scale and quality of the specific diversification opportunity that the IVDC represents — and the extraordinary extent to which coordinated opposition has worked to prevent the community from capturing it.

The Transition Generation

The workers who would fill the 1,688 union construction positions attached to the IVDC are, in many cases, the children and grandchildren of farmworkers. They grew up in the Valley. They have watched the employment opportunities available to them stay relatively flat while opportunities in neighboring regions have expanded. Many have left for better prospects elsewhere. Many who stayed are working in conditions that are challenging even in good years.

The construction trades offer a specific kind of economic mobility that the agricultural economy, for all its real value, has not consistently provided: union wages, benefits, apprenticeship programs, and the portable credentials that allow a skilled tradesperson to build a career regardless of whether the local economy has a specific project underway at any given moment. An IBEW electrician trained on the IVDC build is an IBEW electrician with credentials that have value across the entire West Coast construction economy.

The transition from agricultural to diversified economy is not a betrayal of the Valley’s working-class roots. It is the fulfillment of the aspiration that those roots represent: that the work of a generation builds something better for the next one. The IVDC is one piece of that fulfillment. Getting it built is how the aspiration becomes real.

The Court Has Ruled. The Law Is Clear. It’s Time to Build.

At some point, the arguments run out and the decision remains. That point has been reached in the dispute over the Imperial Valley Data Center.

The legal argument has been resolved. The Superior Court ruled the City of Imperial’s complaint legally insufficient — affirming that the project’s ministerial approval was correct and that the attempt to force it into a discretionary review process has no legal foundation. The law has been applied. The outcome is clear.

The environmental argument has been resolved by the project’s design. The water consumption concern is addressed by the recycled wastewater system. The grid impact concern is addressed by the dedicated substation and the 862 MWh BESS. The land use concern is addressed by I-2 Heavy Industrial zoning that exists precisely to accommodate facilities of this type.

The economic argument is not a argument — it is arithmetic. 1,688 union jobs. $72.5 million in one-time tax revenue. $28.75 million annually thereafter. These are the largest numbers of their kind in Imperial County’s history, from a single project, on land that has been waiting for this use for decades.

What Remains

What remains is an appeal filed by a city that the trial court already ruled against. An appeal that will cost more public money to pursue, add more time to the project’s delay, and arrive at an outcome that the legal framework makes increasingly difficult for the city to win. The appellate court will review the same legal questions the trial court addressed. The by-right zoning doctrine has not changed. The ministerial approval framework has not changed. The Permit Streamlining Act has not changed.

What also remains is a federal civil rights lawsuit that has placed individual officials on notice that the personal financial cost of continued obstruction is no longer zero. The discovery process that lawsuit will generate may produce the documented evidence of coordination and retaliation that the complaint alleges. The officials named in it are making a calculation about whether continued aggressive obstruction is worth the personal exposure it creates.

And what remains is the community’s voice — the residents of Imperial Valley who have the most to gain from this project and who have been largely absent from the public record of a dispute dominated by organized opposition groups, city officials with competing political interests, and a media environment that has given more coverage to the allegations against the developer than to the legal outcomes that dismissed them.

The Time for Waiting Is Over

The County of Imperial has approved this project. The Superior Court has validated that approval. The developer has committed $10 billion in capital, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit to defend the project’s legal rights, and continued to advance development through years of coordinated obstruction.

The people of Imperial Valley have waited long enough. The jobs that would have been filled during these years of litigation are not retrospectively available. The tax revenue that would have been collected is not coming back. The water recycling project that was blocked, the wastewater treatment upgrades that would have benefited El Centro and Imperial, the Salton Sea contributions that would have flowed from an operating facility — none of this can be recovered for the time that has been lost.

What can be recovered is the future. The project is legal. The economic case is overwhelming. The community deserves to have its institutions honor the approval that was lawfully granted and let this project become what Imperial Valley has been waiting for it to be.

The court has ruled. The law is clear. It is time to build.

The AI Arms Race Needs Power. Imperial Valley Has It. This Shouldn’t Be Complicated.

The global competition to build AI infrastructure is, at its base, a competition for electricity. The models that power AI applications — large language models, computer vision systems, recommendation engines — require enormous computational resources to train and run, and those computational resources require enormous amounts of power to operate. The race to build hyperscale AI infrastructure is, in practical terms, a race to find sufficient electricity in sufficient quantities in locations where large-scale construction is feasible.

This race is being run by every major technology company in the world, and by national governments that have recognized AI capability as a strategic priority. The United States, China, the European Union — each is investing in the infrastructure that will determine which nations and which companies lead the AI economy of the next decade.

Imperial Valley is positioned to be part of the American answer to that competition. It has the power. It has the land. It has the grid independence. What it currently lacks is the institutional alignment that allows these advantages to be converted into actual data center construction.

The Power Math

A competitive hyperscale AI training facility operates in the hundreds of megawatts. The IVDC is designed for 330 MW — substantial, but not unusual for the current generation of AI infrastructure investment. Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta are each committing to data center campuses of this scale and larger. The question for site selection is always the same: where is there 300+ megawatts of available, affordable, reliable power with a viable path to interconnection and development?

In California, the honest answer is very few places. CAISO territory is constrained. Coastal locations are expensive. The regulatory environment for large industrial users in populated areas is challenging. Imperial Valley, with IID’s independent grid and geothermal baseload capacity, is one of the genuinely available answers to that question in the entire state.

The IVDC is not just one data center. It is a proof of concept for the viability of Imperial Valley as a data center hub. If it gets built, site selectors will look at the region differently. If it gets blocked, they will draw conclusions from that too — and those conclusions will affect how much of the AI infrastructure buildout lands in California versus in friendlier jurisdictions.

The National Competitiveness Dimension

AI infrastructure is not a private sector vanity project. It is the computational substrate of the next industrial economy. The nations and regions that build it will host the companies that lead it. The communities that attract data center investment will have the jobs, the tax revenue, and the economic momentum that come from being part of the technology supply chain.

Imperial Valley — one of the poorest counties in California — has the natural endowments to be part of this story. The geothermal power resource. The independent grid. The industrial land. The workers who need the jobs. Getting from that potential to that reality requires clearing the obstacles that the current legal and political campaign has placed in the path of a project that has already cleared every legal hurdle the system is supposed to impose.

This shouldn’t be complicated. The land is zoned. The approval was given. The courts have ruled. The opposition has failed at every legal test. The AI infrastructure needs to be built somewhere. Imperial Valley is one of the best places in America to build it. Let it happen.

Imperial Valley’s Independent Grid Is Its Greatest Economic Asset — Don’t Let Insiders Waste It

Most of California’s electricity grid is managed by the California Independent System Operator — CAISO. It is a complex, interconnected system that serves the vast majority of the state, coordinates hundreds of generators and utilities, and manages the moment-to-moment balance of supply and demand across a massive geographic footprint. It is also constrained. Transmission bottlenecks limit where power can flow. Interconnection queues for new generation stretch for years. Major new industrial loads in CAISO territory require extensive studies, upgrades, and cost allocations that can take half a decade to resolve.

Imperial Valley operates outside this system. The Imperial Irrigation District is one of a handful of independent utility systems in California that operates outside CAISO’s authority. IID manages its own generation, its own transmission, and its own distribution. It sets its own rates, manages its own interconnection queue, and makes its own capacity allocation decisions.

For a major data center developer evaluating sites across the Southwest, this independence is not a minor operational detail. It is a fundamental competitive advantage that shortens interconnection timelines, simplifies the regulatory environment, and provides access to a stable, locally-controlled power supply that CAISO-tied utilities cannot reliably offer at the scale a hyperscale data center requires.

What the Independent Grid Enables

A data center that connects to IID’s system does not navigate CAISO’s interconnection queue. It does not compete with hundreds of other projects for transmission capacity on a congested statewide system. It negotiates directly with IID, which has the authority to make binding commitments about service without waiting for CAISO approvals, transmission studies, or allocation decisions made by a system operator in Folsom.

This simplicity has enormous economic value. Interconnection delays in CAISO territory routinely add two to four years to major project timelines. During those years, developers carry costs on land, engineering, and financing without generating revenue. For a $10 billion project, the carrying cost of a two-year delay can approach hundreds of millions of dollars. IID’s independent grid, properly managed to welcome industrial customers, eliminates that exposure entirely.

Imperial Valley is not competing with Riverside County or Sacramento for this investment. It is competing with West Texas, rural Nevada, and eastern Washington. The independent grid is what puts it in the same conversation as those locations — and in some respects ahead of them.

The Waste of Not Using This Advantage

An independent grid that is managed to protect the interests of connected consultants rather than attract the industrial customers it is positioned to serve is not a competitive advantage. It is a wasted asset.

If the allegations in the IVCM federal lawsuit are accurate — that IID’s posture toward the IVDC has been influenced by Z-Global’s competing interests rather than by the utility’s obligation to its ratepayers and its service territory — then Imperial Valley is allowing one of its most significant economic development advantages to be used against itself.

IID’s independent grid should be the headline in every economic development pitch Imperial County makes to site selectors. It should be the reason that major industrial projects choose Imperial Valley over comparable sites in CAISO territory. It should be generating revenue, jobs, and economic development that benefits every household in the service territory.

Instead, it is the subject of a federal lawsuit alleging that its capacity is being allocated to protect a consultancy’s interests rather than serve its ratepayers. That is not the use of a competitive advantage. It is the squandering of one. And the people of Imperial Valley deserve better from the utility they own.

Geothermal Power and AI: Why Imperial Valley Is the Best Location for This Project in America

The AI infrastructure buildout underway globally has a fundamental problem: power. Training large AI models and running inference at scale requires enormous, continuous electricity consumption. The hyperscale facilities that host this compute — buildings the size of shopping malls filled with specialized processors — consume hundreds of megawatts each, and the pipeline for new facilities is constrained not by demand but by the availability of sufficient, reliable, affordable power in locations where large-scale development is feasible.

Imperial Valley solves this problem in ways that almost no other California location can match — and the combination of factors that make it the optimal location is not replicable by any competing site in the state.

Geothermal Baseload: The Power That Never Stops

The Salton Sea sits above one of the most significant geothermal resources in North America. The same volcanic heat that created the Salton Trough drives geothermal energy production at multiple plants already operating in the region. Geothermal power has a characteristic that solar and wind don’t: it runs continuously. No intermittency. No storage requirements for overnight operation. No weather dependency. A geothermal-powered data center runs at full capacity twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, on carbon-free electricity.

For AI compute, this matters critically. AI training runs require sustained high-power operation over periods of days to weeks. Solar power that disappears at sunset and wind power that varies with weather cannot support this load without either massive battery storage or backup fossil fuel generation. Geothermal is baseload — the data center runs when the AI training run requires it, not when the weather permits.

The Independent Grid: No Queue, No Constraints

IID’s independence from CAISO means that a developer connecting to IID’s system avoids the interconnection queue and transmission constraints that have delayed comparable projects in CAISO territory for years. The straightforward regulatory environment — one utility, manageable interconnection process, locally-controlled decision-making — is a competitive advantage that shortens project timelines significantly.

Compare this to the experience of data center developers trying to connect to CAISO’s grid in the Central Valley or Southern California. Interconnection studies take 18-36 months. Transmission upgrades required to support large new loads are allocated through complex cost-sharing arrangements. The regulatory environment is multi-layered. IID offers none of these complications — just a direct path to sufficient power in the quantities the project requires.

Land: Industrial-Zoned and Available

The project site is 75 acres of I-2 Heavy Industrial land — zoned, permitted by right, and available at a price point that no coastal California location can match. The land cost advantage for large-footprint industrial users in Imperial Valley versus comparable sites in the Bay Area or Southern California coastal communities is measured in orders of magnitude. A data center campus that would cost hundreds of millions of dollars per acre in Santa Clara can be built for a fraction of that cost per acre in Imperial County.

The combination of geothermal power, independent grid, industrial zoning, and land cost creates a value proposition for data center development that, when added together, is genuinely unique in the state. These are not arguments for why Imperial Valley is adequate for this project. They are arguments for why it is the optimal location.

The Economic Alignment

The optimal location for AI infrastructure in California happens to be in the highest-unemployment county in the state. That alignment — technical optimality meeting economic need — is not something that happens often. When it does, the institutions of the region are expected to recognize it and act accordingly. The county has. The courts have. The remaining obstacle is the coordinated campaign by officials and organizations whose interests don’t align with the community’s.

That campaign should not succeed. Imperial Valley’s combination of geothermal power, independent grid, industrial land, and economic need is a case that makes itself. The people blocking it are on the wrong side of both the law and the economic logic.

Lithium Valley, the Data Center, and the Economic Future Imperial Valley Keeps Almost Capturing

The economic potential of Imperial Valley has been recognized and discussed for years. The geothermal resources. The lithium in the Salton Sea brine. The solar irradiance. The land. The independent grid. Academic papers have been written, government reports commissioned, investment conferences held. The Valley is consistently described as one of the most significant untapped economic development opportunities in the American West.

And yet the transformation keeps not quite arriving. CTR is fighting through CEQA challenges. The IVDC is fighting through litigation. Other projects in the pipeline face similar obstacles. The gap between the Valley’s recognized potential and its realized economic development is large and persistent.

That gap has a cause. It is not geological, it is not infrastructural, and it is not financial. It is political and institutional. The same patterns that are documented in the IVDC fight — organized CEQA obstruction, coordinated opposition by officials and organizations with competing interests, manufactured legal exposure — appear across multiple projects in the region. The Valley keeps almost capturing its economic future because certain actors benefit from the capture never completing.

What a Realized Lithium Valley Requires

Lithium Valley — the geothermal lithium extraction opportunity in the Salton Sea region — is a national strategic priority. Domestic lithium supply for electric vehicle batteries and grid storage is a critical minerals challenge that affects the United States’ ability to transition its energy system and reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains. Imperial Valley is the most significant domestic opportunity for addressing that challenge.

Realizing that opportunity requires multiple large projects getting built in a reasonable timeframe. CTR and its competitors have invested years and significant capital in development. They have navigated federal, state, and local approval processes. They are capable of building these projects. What they need is an institutional environment that allows permitted projects to proceed — without the greenmail demands, the coordinated CEQA campaigns, and the jurisdictional overreach that have characterized the Imperial Valley development environment.

The IVDC fight is connected to the Lithium Valley fight because the same institutional environment affects both. A region that demonstrates — through the IVDC outcome — that permitted projects can be completed despite organized obstruction sends a different signal to every Lithium Valley developer than a region that demonstrates the opposite.

The Data Center as Infrastructure for Everything Else

The IVDC is not just a data center. It is demand-side infrastructure for the energy economy that the Valley is trying to build. A 330-megawatt industrial customer for IID creates the load that justifies additional generation investment. Additional generation investment makes more geothermal projects financially viable. More geothermal projects bring more lithium extraction. Lithium extraction brings battery manufacturing interest. Battery manufacturing brings the entire value chain of the clean energy transition to a region that has the resources to anchor it.

None of this happens if the first major step — a hyperscale data center on industrial land with access to geothermal power — gets blocked by organized obstruction after clearing every legal hurdle. The IVDC is the anchor tenant of an economic ecosystem that doesn’t exist yet but could. The fight over whether it gets built is a fight over whether that ecosystem ever starts to form.

Imperial Valley has been on the verge of transformation for too long. The people who live there are entitled to see that transformation actually happen, and to hold accountable the actors who have made it their business to prevent it.

An Attorney and an Engineer: Why Rucci’s Dual License Makes Him the Right Developer for This Fight

Most real estate developers hire attorneys. Some developers understand the law well enough to direct their legal strategy intelligently. Almost none are licensed attorneys capable of fully grasping the constitutional arguments in a Section 1983 civil rights complaint from first principles.

Most attorneys who work in land use law understand zoning codes and administrative procedure. Few understand the civil engineering constraints that determine whether a 950,000-square-foot industrial building with a 330-megawatt power load and an 862 MWh battery storage system is technically feasible on a specific 75-acre site.

Sebastian Rucci is both — a licensed civil engineer and a licensed attorney. That combination is unusual in development, and in the specific context of the IVDC fight, it matters in concrete ways.

The Engineering Dimension

The IVDC’s technical design — the recycled wastewater cooling system, the dedicated substation, the BESS, the structural requirements for a near-million-square-foot data hall — is not a standard development engineering challenge. It requires integration of electrical infrastructure, mechanical systems, civil site work, and environmental systems at a scale and complexity that most developers manage through the accumulated judgment of consultants they don’t fully understand.

A developer with a civil engineering license can engage with those technical dimensions directly. He can evaluate the engineering proposals his team produces, identify where the technical constraints intersect with the legal framework, and understand whether the arguments his opponents make about technical impact are accurate. When the opposition claims the project will crash the grid or drain the Colorado River, a developer with engineering training can engage with those claims technically, not just politically.

This matters for the water and energy arguments in particular. The recycled water system design — the treatment upgrades, the closed-loop cooling architecture, the integration with municipal wastewater infrastructure — involves engineering details that determine whether the system works as described. Rucci can evaluate those details in a way that most developers cannot.

The Legal Dimension

The IVDC dispute is not primarily a development dispute. It is a constitutional law case. The Section 1983 civil rights claims, the First Amendment retaliation theory, the Permit Streamlining Act deemed-approved argument — these are federal constitutional and statutory law questions of real complexity. A developer who can engage with those questions directly, rather than depending entirely on legal counsel whose strategic judgments he cannot fully evaluate, has a significant advantage in managing a multi-front legal campaign.

The decision to file the federal civil rights lawsuit — naming individual officials, invoking constitutional theories, accepting the risk and cost of multi-year federal litigation — is not a standard developer decision. It reflects a legal strategic judgment that the conventional developer’s tool kit (administrative appeals, state court litigation, political negotiation) was not sufficient for this fight, and that federal constitutional claims offered a path to both legal vindication and deterrence of continued obstruction.

Making that judgment correctly requires legal sophistication that most developers contract out. Rucci executed it from internal understanding.

The Fit for This Particular Fight

The IVDC fight is simultaneously a technical argument (does the project’s design adequately address water and energy concerns?), a legal argument (was the approval process correct and the city’s challenge legally sufficient?), a constitutional argument (were the developer’s civil rights violated by government officials?), and a political argument (who benefits from this project and who benefits from blocking it?).

A developer who brings both engineering and legal credentials to that multi-dimensional fight is better positioned than one who brings only business judgment and external consultants. The specific combination of skills Rucci holds is matched to the specific nature of the fight he is in. That is not coincidental. It is one of the reasons the project is still proceeding after years of coordinated opposition that would have driven away most developers.